|
Mme. Michelle Falardeau-Ramsay Q.C. is tense. She is as tense as a chicken's instep. She's so tense she's sweating butter. She is also the Canadian Human Rights Commission's Chief Commissioner. What the fuck is going on! She shrills with fishwife vibrato. Really it's more a statement than a question. With unrelenting vehemence she shrills on with no less volume. I travel outside of this country – what maybe nine, ten, no - maybe a dozen or so times a year! Never more than two or thee weeks at a stretch - not counting my annual six-week vacation! How is it possible, her piercing voice demands, that just a day or so before I'm scheduled to return, that fucking Machiavelli & his asshole Lawyerslayer buddy embarrass the living shit out of me and my Commission! She's ranting and raving, simultaneously gasping for breath and stomping heavily in a rudimentary effort to regain a semblance of self-control. She's a sight to behold and a right fright. Her jowls are jiggling. Her pumpkin like face is beet red. She smells sweaty. If damn isn't swearing then the Chief Commissionaire isn't ambitious and fat. Her pounding pulse panics her. She instinctively knows she needs to gain control over herself because knows she's yet to deal with the latest Zundel set back. The ides of March are here and the Canadian Rights Commission's Chief Commissar is mad. Mad as a hatter. Mad as a biting sow. Her Commission, like her sup-hose is unraveling, literally bursting apart at the seams. This was her perfect dream job. She met all the qualifications. A female liberal lawyer accepted to the Quebec bar. What other qualifications could there possibly be to headman the Canadian Human Rights Commission/Tribunal? Having never won a beauty contest, she enjoys the constant flying around the world at taxpayers' expense and boasting bellicosely to hapless third world counties about Canada's second class and special interest groups' human rights. Giving redundant speeches at various Universities and attending oodles of pseudo human rights conferences without regard to cost or content is beginning to fill her inner void. A void previously impossible to sate even with a constant ingestion of éclairs & canapés. With no apparent other qualifications required, a successful Human Rights Commission career is her guaranteed steppingstone to being named/appointed by the Prime Minister's Office to the Supreme Court of Canada, proviso she keeps the Commission together and a French female Supreme Court Justice dies. Where's Richard she wonders? Mr. Richard Tardif is the Canadian Human Rights Commission's Chief Counsel and Madam's right hand man. He'll know what to do. He always does. He was there when the Commission opened for business. She's ever so reliant on him. Secretly she wishes Richard had a thing for heavy and sweaty, yet short women. Just shoot him Richard Tardif is smart. He is a survivor. He sees himself the next Chief Commissar. His chances are great. He does what it takes to make the Commission/Tribunal successful at suiting his needs. Richard and Eddie Taylor are having a billable discussion in the executive boardroom. Richard is anxious. He's anticipating Madame Chief's return from one of her many junkets. He knows he has to placate and soothe the Mighty Madame for a few days until she embarks on her next make and pretend work excursion. Since this Commission began, he barks belligerently, we've been trying to nail Zundel. We've done everything to stack the deck against him. What do we have to do to shut him up? Shoot him, retorts Eddie. Mr. Eddie Taylor is the Canadian Human Rights Commission's lead counsel in the Zundel Tribunal. He is also one of the few independent thinking government lawyers Eddie is like a fish out of water. He has boxed professionally and rides his Harley like Absolon road his horse. He does not fit the Commission's profile. Eddie is a likeable character; a right winged New Democrat who appreciates Machiavelli more than he does the Commission. Mr. Eddie Taylor is a rogue lawyer because has a heart and under only slightly different circumstances could have been a lawyerslayer of some renown. Shoot him? Richard yelps, as if shot himself. Yep, just shoot him retorts Eddie. Lets face it, says Eddie as flexes his formidable frame, Zundel is just another Kraut fuck unable to deal with the obvious and well-deserved German burden of guilt. Zundel is also a Hitler-waco and ought never to be allowed to become Canadian. Ernst Zundel deserves deportation. On the other hand, he is also a rich German fuck who can afford the irrepressible Mr. Christie and company. What we need to do, Eddie urges, is to waste no more time with Zundel. Let the chips fall where they may. Wash our hands like Pontius Pilate did. We can correct all our mistakes by filling in all the pitfalls encountered in the Zundel fiasco with another victim. He continues at a faster pace. Zundel is just too big a fish for us to fry for the first time around. We have to throw him back for now. He has too many followers including that pesky Freedom of Speech guy, Paul Fromm. What's his story anyway? How did he ever get Intervener status? Not that it matters now. Now that we know what not to do, Eddie continues, let's concentrate on the profiling of the next victim so we might deliver an enforceable Internet Jurisdiction precedent. Eddie is making sense. Sense enough to pay attention. What about Machiavelli & the Lawyerslayer muses Richard out loud. We all know how much Madame Buttertart would like to see them silenced. Somewhat soberly, Richard continues, the Mighty Madam knows she's facing a Zundel defeat and therefore will turn her other blind eye to victimizing anybody in our holy quest for Internet Jurisdiction, especially Machiavelli & the Lawyerslayer, Richard is euphoric. Eddie, this is great, this will work. You'll fly first class to Vancouver, stay, eat and entertain somewhere expensive, like the Sutton, Hy's and Brandy's. There will be no budget restraints. Richard is rallying on the run. Machiavelli & the Lawyerslayer do what they do from the Royal City. They lunch or dine at Stefanos at least three times a week. The other days they're at the Westminster Club or at Salvatore's. Finding them will be easy, doing something about them won't be. So scout around, do some reconnaissance. See what kind of dirt you can dig up. The best bet of finding & soliciting a compliant complainant is in Vancouver's West End. You do not have to be homosexual to live there but it helps and with your pony tail and unlimited entertainment expenses you'll attract a flurry of faggots willing to feign sexual orientation discrimination even if you have to write the complaint yourself. Eddie is jubilant. Vancouver is his favorite city and hangout. Now Eddie, Richard continues, mum's the word and leave Madame Butterball to me. By the way Eddie, that Free Speech Guy Paul Fromm likes to meet and greet neo nazis in North Vancouver at that Motel at the foot of Capilano. You can't miss the immediate left turn into the Motel as you turn up from Marine Drive. Check out who comes and goes. Apparently pesky Paul is starting to regain his following because of his denial of Keegstra and his zealous support for Zundel. We want an ongoing investigation on anyone who supports Zundel and free speech. Sieg Heil! Ernst Zundel addresses his Holocaust denier hoedown where there're always more chairs than seats. With germane Germanic logic he wonders why they don't make smaller gathering rooms. Ernst Zundel looks like Sgt. Schultz and talks like Colonel Klink on steroids. Scheissen in der Hossen! Mein Gott in Himmel, he screams, loud enough to drown out most anti aircraft fire. He has their attention. He scans the room and notices a number of new faces. As usual, the room is also occupied with known Edmund Burkers, an uncomfortable assortment of skinheads and a couple of old guys looking ridiculous in their lederhosen. Paul Fromm is sitting front and center. Ernst notices with pit-bull pleasure that the two Davids, Irving and Duke made the effort. Seemingly, their presence intensifies his intensity. For the good of the Reich hisses Ernst, no, I mean for the good of Aryan Nations everywhere we have to banish Jim Keegstra. Keegstra can no longer be seen as one of us. We must silence that rat bastard Keegstra, hisses Ernst, like an adder in heat. He must be eradicated. Sieg Heil! In unison the audience returns the salute. Ernst likes to say the words Sieg Heil & Blitzkrieg and is on a roll. He pauses, pretending to ponder. He's actually taking it down a notch. He readies himself for his best Henry Kissinger impression and continues with a noticeably thicker accent. I spy quite a few new faces. I thank you for attending. For your information I have spent the last 6 to 9 months in a losing battle trying to convince Keegstra that for the good of our holy cause he has to lighten up. The number one concern with Keegstra is Keegstra's total denial of the Holocaust. I told him, you can argue the numbers but you have to stop denying the very existence. Fuck you and the horse you came in on Keegstra told me. Fuck me? Fuck you I told him. Ernst sucks air like a Panzer sucks fuel. He fills his barrel chest to the max and with a straight face says, the solution before the final solution is, to commandeer Paul Fromm to cause a collective compromise with Keegstra for the sake of our holy-cause. Paul Fromm's sphincter puckers. With buttocks firmly clenched Paul Fromm and Jim Keegstra were both tenured Canadian high school history teachers. Both ran afoul of the system by deviating from the prescribed teaching curriculum. Both openly endorse White Supremacists. Both are diminutive men. Both suffer from a Napoleonic complex without courage. Keegstra intimidates Paul. Rather than foul himself, Paul stands up to leave the room. His standing is incorrectly interpreted as his acceptance of the mission. The audience confirms his stance with exuberant Sieg Heils. With buttocks firmly clenched he basks in the attention. You phony wanna be Nazi, Keegstra spits! What about my freedom of speech? This is Canada - I can say anything I want. Who the hell are you and Zundel to talk to me? Zundel is not even Canadian and you're merely an opportunist. As far as I'm concerned there never was a Holocaust, fumes Keegstra. The Holocaust is a hoax he scoffs. Arguing the numbers of a nonevent is nonsense. The disconnect click can be heard across the room. Goddamn him whispers Paul. Sensing failure, he scans his office seeking comfort from the clutter and as if by rote dials Doug Christie's number. Doug Christie occupies the smallest and quaintest law office in Canada. Doug Christie confirms that size does not always count. Good morning, drawls Christie with enthusiasm expecting the call to be from Barbara Kulaszka. Unable to hide his disappointment his enthusiasm wanes. Oh it's you, what's wrong? Well, says Paul pretending not to notice the apathy, you have to talk to Keegstra. Paul is short of breath, but continues. The problem is, Keegstra is a Dutchman and you know how obtuse they can be. Keegstra won't listen to me. He could split the party. I don't know what to do. I cannot support both Keegstra and Zundel because I can't afford the diminished donations. Keegstra insists on continuing to deny the very existence of the entire holocaust. Ernst Zundel says he can't go there and has commissioned me to … I think … I feel I might fail our fuehrer. Paul is now completely out of breath and has to stop talking or expire. Christie interjects – Ernst would go there if he could but he knows he can't so he doesn't and that, my little friend, makes Zundel sane and Keegstra crazy. Besides, Keegstra is out of money, therefore, I am tossing him like a live grenade and I suggest you follow suit. Without our continued support, the Canadian Human Rights Commission's Tribunal will finish him for us. How brilliant is that? That's why I get the big buck. Paul is stunned into silence. Paul is Canada's self-appointed freedom of speech lobbyist. Paul is an idealist, wrapped in and still flying the Union Jack. Paul supports all white Anglo-Saxon Protestants. Paul is amazing. He zealously supports Zundel and appears to ape Joseph Goebbels' propaganda policies while furthering a white supremacy concept all under the guise of free speech. CAFÉ Paul has organized himself to accept donations through his organization called the Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFÉ) and he'll do anything to keep the donations coming. Paul's not stupid. He's well read. He understands the power of the pen and he understands Parliament's profuse political patronage proliferation. Unfortunately, all his sound suggestions to mitigate the absolute power of the Prime Minister's office by policing political patronage are drowned out by the sound of boots on cobblestones. In the final analysis, Paul Fromm is not a bad man. He's simply misguided like a ship without a rudder. Paul is blessed with some Sancho Panza like qualities but constantly chooses callous causes and cruel comrades. He has the intelligence to appreciate Machiavelli but lacks the balls to personify him. Instead, Paul personifies the Peter Principle. Paul Fromm and his tiny tired troop of tawdry tin soldiers were about out of causes in which to intervene and virtually out of reasons for donations when out of nowhere came the Internet over which his arch antagonist and sworn enemy, the Canadian Human Rights Commission Tribunal, seeks jurisdiction. New victims, new causes, new donors and new donations - Paul has new life. Paul, I take your silence as agreement, Christie states icily. By the way Paul, pay attention, I hear that the Commission will be infiltrating your next North Vancouver meeting. Also, I have it from reliable sources that the Commission is going to regroup to recoup from their predicted Zundel fiasco by setting up Machiavelli & the Lawyerslayer. Paul is always amazed at the information Doug Christie is able to glean from deep inside the Canadian Human Rights Commission. Incidentally Paul, we're organizing a Doug Collins University Scholarship Trust for history majors hungering for false and horrific Holocaust hoaxes. We want to commence the fund raising at your next Vancouver/Victoria CAFÉ meetings. So start up the donations bandwagon. Listen Paul I have a meeting with an associate who is bringing some phony international banker by the name of Chuck Kaleda. Apparently he (Chuck) is bringing some eastern European inventor and self-proclaimed genius named Bratislaf Klucko or something like that. According to Chuck, this bohunk is a real asshole, always socially embarrassing to be around but apparently great at making prototypes for Chuck's privately funded projects. They've got some G.P.S. system they want me to promote to the Germans. We're straight now about Keegstra? Uh huh. Good, so switch your donation bandwagon efforts to Collins. Branislav Klco needs Chuck Kaleda and Chuck Kaleda needs Branislav. Chuck and Branislav need each other like sycophants need Asses. Chuck & Branislav are like two peas in a pod, perfectly matched. Chuck & Branislav are thick as thieves. Branislav further claims to be an accomplished artist, chess master and proudly proclaims his hero as Rasputin. HOW CAN A RIGHTS AGENCY GO SO WRONG HOW CAN A RIGHTS AGENCY GO SO WRONG screams the headline of National Post promotionally delivered to Mr. Paul Henderson. Paul Henderson is a freelance reporter writer for Vancouver's homosexual and lesbian bi-weekly. The Xtra West newspaper caters to Vancouver's West End homosexual residents. The National Post's headline reports the story about two Toronto homosexuals who claimed sexual orientation discrimination before the Canadian Human Rights Agency because they were reprimanded for fondling and giving tongue in the work place. The homosexual's argument is, that if its okay for heterosexual women to breast-feed in the work place then it's equally okay for homosexuals to grope, grinds and exchange bodily fluids in said workplace. The Canadian Human Rights Commission's Tribunal finds in favor of the homosexuals and orders the employer to ban breast-feeding by all hetero and homosexuals alike. The atmosphere at the headquarters of the Xtra West Newspaper is rife with impassioned self-loathing fervently masquerading as a self-righteous cause. Allegedly one of the young articling bum buddies at the Rights Commission in Ottawa was compromised into compromising the contents of the conspiracy agenda against Machiavelli & the Lawyerslayer. It is now common knowledge among Vancouver's West-end homosexuals that the Canadian Human Rights Commission's Tribunal is looking for a martyr who, with a straight face, will claim sexual orientation discrimination after reading Machiavelli's Website's opines about homosexual pedophiles. Paul Henderson's nose knows there is a story here. He's a good reporter. He can and does smell behaviour unbecoming. The selection committee (for the winning sexual orientation discrimination compliant complainant and the runner up should the winner's health fail) appears to be overwhelmed by a plethora of compromising candidates whose definition of a long term relationship is the length of time it takes to travel from one bathhouse to another. To resolve the problem the selection committee invites all compliant complainant candidates for an information and parameter setting conference at the Rembrandt Hotel on Davie St. to be addressed by lawyer and Member of Parliament, Mr. Svend Robinson. After laying out the agenda the moderator asks for all those who have heard about or read Machiavelli to remain seated and for those that haven't to move to the hosted bar in the adjoining room. The vast majority stands to leave. Addressing the remaining he asks for a show of hands from those who've visited Machiavelli's website in the past 12 months. A lone hand appears. And the winner is >>> you, who raised your hand, what's your name? My name is mark schnell. homosexual pedophile mark schnell, congratulations, you have won the opportunity to become the compliant complainant in the as yet to be announced Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. There will be no runner up. We wish you good health. Tell us something about yourself mark. Well, I am a homosexual. Probably because when I was young I was molested. I am Catholic and I like to play dress up in priestly garments. I would like to become a Boy or Cub Scout Troop Leader. I live nearby an elementary school. I enjoy sharing kiddie boy porn pictures with billy bennest. I have visited Machiavelli's site lots of times. Upon every visit I feel discriminated against. Machiavelli's site scares me every time and I've gone back dozens of times. Please tell us how was it that you went there in the first place? Well the site is extremely difficult to find. It's not linked to anything. The site is basically standalone. Without direction one would probably never come across it. I've spent tens of thousands of hours surfing the web for homo porn and I never saw it until a friend of a friend who works for the British Columbia Human Rights Commission advised me of the URL. The British Columbia Human Rights Commission and its Tribunal are under the full weight of Ms. Mary Who Sins'. The British Columbia Human Rights Commission and its Tribunal find favorably for the fired Jehovah Witness employee who claimed religious discrimination and wrongful dismissal after being fired. Fired because he refused to handle Christmas decorations in the normal course of his employer's business. The British Columbia Human Rights Commission and its Tribunal bring new meaning to the word bastardization as a result of State and Church intercourse. The competence of lawyers working in house for the British Columbia Human Rights Commission and its Tribunal is such that virtually all work is farmed out to select lawyers at appointed law firms willing to further the agenda. These lawyers and law firms are rewarded like Quebec ad agencies. History July 21,1925 The "Trial of the Century" concludes and convicts schoolteacher, John T. Scopes of violating Tennessee law against teaching evolution in public schools. The jury confers only for a few moments in the hallway before returning to the courtroom with a guilty verdict. The Scopes trial like the Machiavelli Tribunal was never more than a show trial. May 3, 1925, the American Civil Liberties Union published a national newspaper ad offering to help any Tennessee schoolteacher challenge the new law that outlawed the teaching of evolution. George W. Rappleyea, a New Yorker who had moved to Dayton Tennessee, read the ad and persuaded the local townspeople that Dayton should host a trial in order to spark national and international interest in the town. The leaders of the less than 2,000 residents of Dayton quickly came around to Rappleyea's idea. The school superintendent not only agreed with the law, but also wanted to gain publicity for the town. Even Dayton's prosecutors were in on the deal. The last piece of the puzzle was to find a defendant. Twenty-four-year-old John T. Scopes, a local high school science teacher and football coach, agreed to fill the roll since he wasn't planning on staying in Dayton for the long term. No one was really concerned whether he had actually taught evolution to his students. The fact that he had been using the state-approved science textbook, which included a chapter on evolution, was deemed sufficient. A warrant was made for Scopes' arrest and word went out that the trial would begin in the summer. Although the rest of Tennessee was displeased with Dayton's plan, 500 seats were added to the town's courtroom for press and spectators. Loudspeakers were set up on the lawn outside and in four auditoriums around town. This proved necessary when the nation's leading figures in the evolution debate hijacked the case from the local attorneys. William Jennings Bryan, a former congressman who had twice run for president before serving as Secretary of State for Woodrow Wilson, took over the prosecution. William Jennings Bryan had personally initiated the campaign against evolution in the United States. The Tennessee evolution law was his first major success. Knowing that it would be the perfect forum to debate Bryan on the evolution and creationism issues, the great liberal lawyer Clarence Darrow wormed his way into the case as the defense attorney. While the press flooded into Dayton for the showdown between these two larger-than-life figures, a Chicago radio station broadcast the trial live, a first in America. The trial opened with magnificent speeches from both Bryan and Darrow. However, it soon became evident that the trial judge was not going to play along. He (the Judge) cut off every attempt by Darrow to debate the validity of evolution. The trial would have been completely uneventful except for a creative gambit by Darrow when he called Bryan as a witness. Although the judge would never have allowed a prosecutor to be called, as a defense witness, Bryan didn't dare back down to the challenge. In a famous exchange, Darrow questioned Bryan on the literal interpretation of the Bible's account of the beginning of the world. With masterful questioning, Darrow forced Bryan to admit that a purely literal interpretation was not possible, making him look very foolish. Darrow's performance didn't save Scopes from a conviction and $100 fine (which was later overturned on a technicality) In the mainstream press and the minds of the moral majority, the theory of evolution clearly won the debate. History repeating itself July 21,1998 The “Tribunal of the Century” seeds are sown. 69 plus four years since the conclusion of The “Trial of the Century”, mark schnell not understanding the deviances between Federal & Provincial Human Rights Commissions and their Tribunals phones Ms. Eri Yamagata, a British Columbia Human Rights Commission Officer, to complain about Machiavelli's citizens research instrument website. Allegedly, his feelings are hurt. Can mark schnell be the reincarnation of George W. Rappleyea? schnell complains that Machiavelli's Citizens Research site has hate questions against homosexual people. According to schnell, “one of the most offensive questions is: Are all homosexuals pedophiles or are all pedophiles homosexual?'” schnell directs Ms. Yamagata to www.internic.net which, schnell states, provides information on who the provider is and who actually created the website. Ms. Yamagata admits that she is not entirely sure how the procedure works for a hate question complaint. She says to schnell, I will do some research on the procedure and get back to you. Hate questions? Can schnell not read? Is history about to repeat itself? Yes, the more things change the more they stay the same. Only the names change. For example – Balloon financing, once illegal, is now legal because they call it leasing. Later that same day mark schnell e-mails Ms. Yamagata. I've attached in word format a 3page document that points out specifically my discontent with the site. Quite frankly, I believe that the questions promote hatred against homosexuals and this places my life and the lives of other homosexuals in danger. To determine how many minds they have polluted, Uniserve.com's records would have figures as to how many thousands have read these blatant falsehoods. I look forward to hearing from you. Should the attachment be unreadable I can resend in word-perfect format signed mark schnell@gayfucksites.com The next day schnell again e-mails Ms. Yamagata. In the three page document I sent you, I left out a quote (IV) and rebuttal (D) Please consider these as additional statements that promotes hatred and contempt. Quote IV Despite constant denial, the “homosexual community” does have an agenda. They want to regress our society back to ancient Greece, where men had “boy toys” and “sheep were nervous”. (D) Suggesting ”boy toys”; says that homosexuals engage in pedophilia. Also, saying, “that sheep were nervous”; means that homosexuals also engage in the act of bestiality. These statements promote hatred against homosexuals. Should you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 801-6267. Also if you have trouble opening the three attachment documents in my pervious e-mail, I can instruct you. Signed mark schnell@gayfucksites.com Schnell e-mails again Ms. Yamagata. With the website having the name of citizensresearchinst.com one might be inclined to think that it is operated by the infamous Citizen's Research Institute, which is at odds with G.A.L.E., (Gay and Lesbian Educators) despite the fact that the citizensresearchinst.com makes reference to disliking G.A.L.E. the internet records do not show that the website I'm complaining about is owned by the Citizens Research Institute. It may well be that Ken Fast and Machiavelli and Associates Emprize sympathizes with them. Therefore my complaint is only against Ken Fast, Machiavelli and Associates Emprize (and perhaps also Uniserve.com – the internet provider) I should also mention that the website refers frequently to legal cases involving pedophiles and light sentences received. I must confess that I am quite ignorant of the cases, and do not like to be considered a pedophile mark schnell@gayfucksites.com Ms. Eri Yamagata replies to mark schnell@gayfucksites.com Dear mark Thank you for your e-mail regarding the hate questions on the web._ Actually, our computer could not read the three documents attached to your e-mail._ Could you please re-send it in word perfect (for windows format). If there is a problem, please call me at 666-2252 or you can also fax the documents to 666-2386 Thank you. Eri Yamagata July 22,1998 INTERNAL BC HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION MEMO TO FILE From: Eri Yamagama, to herself I have informed mr. schnell that we received a response from Ottawa on the inquiry regarding his case. The response was that before we take a complaint on hate message, we would have to determine that the complainant found the particular website in question on a number of occasions. Also, the hate messages would have to meet a set standard. schnell informed me that the first time he saw the website was probably either June 22 or June 23. Since then, he found the website more than 30 times. schnell also found out that the website was created Dec. 11 97. Since then more than 2000 people visited the website. schnell is concerned that this website sends hate messages against homosexuals and that people will believe the kind of misleading information presented by this website. I informed schnell that I would be sending his file to Ottawa, after I draw a short complaint form based on what he had told me. Eight Days Later July 30,1998 INTERNAL BC HUMAN RIGHTS MEMO To: Alwyn Child Compliance Director Canadian Human Rights Commission From: Sheri Helgason A/Regional Director British Columbia / Yukon Region Human Rights Commission Subject: Enclosed intake file on hate message complaint Enclosed is the intake file for schnell v. Machiavelli and Associates Emprize Inc. schnell's allegation is that this company created a website which contains hate messages against homosexuals. I would appreciate it if you could advise whether another intake file should be opened for the domain server uniserve. Thank you, Sherri Helgason From: Alwyn Child Compliance Director Canadian Human Rights Commission To Sheri Helgason A/Regional Director British Columbia / Yukon Region Human Rights Commission Thank you, I am now in receipt. Background We know that during the first week of Aug.98, Alwyn Child, a Compliance Director, of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, a.k.a. “Big Sister” is in receipt of the schnell intake file sent by Sherri Helgason, from the B.C. Rights subsidiary, a.k.a. “little sister”. What happens to the file, from the first week of August 98 to the second week of Feb.99, remains a mystery. And you thought there was a big gap in the “Nixon Tapes”? ”Big Sister” and her twelve provincial “little sisters” are loath to provide any info. Questions: 1) Does Alwyn Child sit on schnell's file? 2) If so, Why? 3) Alternatively, Whom does Alwyn Child give schnell's intake file to? 4) What does that person do with the schnell intake file? 5) Why this file? 6) How or what causes it to “reappear”? What we do know is that we don't know what went on with the schnell intake file during the months between Aug.98 and Feb.99. We consider the gap as the “mark ages”. The commission would have you believe that after a frenzy of activity during July98, that: 1) the complainant schnell does not follow up, 2) does not ask what happened, 3) does not make an inquiry that would trigger a response and 4) never make contact for six months!!!!!! You don't know mark schnell. !!!! According to the Commission, the file goes A.W.O.L., for 6 months, all the while the constant complainant mark schnell stands quiet and patiently by. Unbelievable!! You haven't met mark. If you had met mark, you wouldn't, couldn't believe it either because mark has an agenda. Because mark would, could never stand idly by, because mark's time is marked because he is infected. The paper trail begins Feb.99. Please find all the available to me, Internal Canadian Human Rights Memos, written after the “mark ages” and before T-day, Aug.18 1999. February 12,1999 INTERNAL CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS CASE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE DOCUMENT File # W 48126 Complainant schnell / Respondent Machiavelli The Committee suggests that material from the website be submitted to Legal Services for an opinion on whether it constitutes hate messages before the complaint form is signed. The legal opinion should also address the question of whether Machiavelli and Associates Emprize is the appropriate respondent.” Signed Michel Pare, A/Director, Compliance, Canadian Human Rights Commission March 22,1999 INTERNAL CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS MEMO To: Anne Rooke From: Michel Pare According to the attached opinion, the Internet message in mr. schnell's complaint does meet the legal test for a complaint under section 13 (1). Please check with the complainant that he wishes to pursue the matter. If he still wishes to file a complaint, we will need to verify whether the message is still on the Internet, and amend the complaint form to bring it up to date. Signed Michel Pare, A/Director, Compliance Canadian Human Rights Commission March 29,1999 CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS LETTERHEAD Re File W48126 To: mr. mark schnell Vancouver B.C. Enclosed please find two completed copies of the complaint form prepared in response to your allegations of discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation against Machiavelli and Associates Emprize Inc. One copy is to be signed by you and returned to this office; the other (stamped “Copy) is to be retained for your records. It is important that you read the form carefully before signing it. Complaint forms, which are legal documents, are the property of the Canadian Human Rights Commission and cannot, once signed, be withdrawn without its approval. If the form does not accurately reflect your allegations, please do not sign it. Instead, telephone me as soon as possible so that we can discuss the matter. If the form does not require revision, please sign and date each page, and return one copy to me. If you have additional comments to make, I would ask you to write them on a separate sheet of paper, and not on the form itself. Once we have received the signed and dated form, an investigator will be assigned to your complaint, and Machiavelli and Associates Emprize Inc. will be officially notified. May I take this opportunity to remind you of your obligation as a complainant to mitigate potential damages arising from your complaint. If we do not receive your signed complaint form by April 16, 1999, we will assume that you do not wish to proceed further and your file will be closed. Should you wish to raise this matter again in the future, you should be aware that under section 41 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, the Commission may refuse to deal with complaints which are filed more than one year after the alleged discriminatory act(s). If you have any questions or concerns, please call me 1-888-214-1090 or collect at (613) 943-9133 Signed Rell DeShaw Compliance Directorate” April 12,1999 INTERNAL HUMAN RIGHTS MEMO From: From: Sheri Helgason A/Regional Director B.C. and Yukon Region Human Rights Commission To: CHRC.HQ. ANNE ROOK, CHRC. HQ. FRANCOISE GIRARD C/O CHRC Subject: W48126 I received a call today from mr. mark schnell. mr. schnell said that he spoke with an officer two weeks ago, and she advised him that, his complaint form was being sent out by courier. He is concerned because he has not yet received it. I confirmed his address in CMS. I am not sure whom the file was assigned to (it is not in CMS) but he has asked that the person assigned call him. He advised that in addition to the telephone number in CMS, he can also be reached at his cell phone number (604) 830-6267 Could I ask for your assistance in passing this along to the assigned officer? (I am mailing both of you because this file may have been transferred to HQ before policy complaints were transferred to C&I)” Thanks, Sheri April 14,1999 CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS LETTERHEAD Re File W48126 To: mr. mark schnell Vancouver B.C. This letter, from Rell DeShaw is identical to the letter he send to mark schnell on March 29,1999, except the date for return. The enclosed two completed copies of the complaint form filled out by the commission, to be signed by mark has been extended from April 16,1999 to May 14,1999 May 3,1999, Five hundred and thirty years ago Niccolo Machiavelli was born. To commemorate this day, Michel Pare A/Director Compliance for “Big Sister” sends an INTERNAL COMMISSION MEMO to Nicole Kennedy an A/Director Complaints and Investigations for same “Big Sister”, which reads as follows: schnell v. Machiavelli Please find attached the intake file for the above-noted file. The complaint form has been signed and is enclosed. Information has been provided to Lise Leon so that she can register the respondent and the matter can be moved to Phase III shortly. This file is now ready for investigation. Signed, M. Pare, A/Director, Compliance, Canadian Human Rights Commission” May 14, 1999 INTERNAL CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHT MEMO To: J. Gerald Savard From: Nicole Kennedy Director General A/Director Anti Discrimination Program Complaints and Investigations Subject: schnell v. Machiavelli and Associates Emprize Inc. – complaint sec. 13 This is to inform you that mark schnell has filed a section 13 complaint against Machiavelli Associates Emprize inc. on April 29, 1999, alleging that the website www.citizensresearchinst.com contains hate messages against homosexuals. The file has been assigned to Martin Chaumont for investigation. Prior to notification, we are determining how to gather the needed proof when visiting the web site, the frequency of the visits and what to do if the site has been moved. The informatics division informed us that they cannot provide a non-individualized e-mail account that would shield the fact that the visitor is from the CHRC. Advice is being sought from Legal Services on this issue in the attached memo.” (To his credit, Mr. J. Gerald Savard, returns this memo to Nicole after handwriting the following on the face of this memo;) “ Nicole! Given that Zundel is before the Crts I do not think we should have taken this case, Equally, our practice has been to try to sort things out via early resolution We need to discuss” May 25, 1999 INTERNAL CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS MEMO To: William Penney From: Nicole Kennedy General Legal Counsel A/Director Complaints and Investigations Subject: schnell v. Machiavelli and Associates Emprize Inc. –complaint sec.13 “This is to inform you that Mark Schnell has filed a section 13 complaint against Machiavelli Associates Emprize inc. on April 29, 1999 alleging that the web site, www.citizensresearchinst.com contains hate messages against homosexuals. The file has been assigned to martin Chaumont for investigation. Prior to notification, we would like to have your advice on how to gather the needed proof when visiting the web site, the frequency of the visits and what to do if the site has been moved. The Informatics division informed us that they cannot provide a non individualized e-mail account that would shield the fact that the visitor is from CHRC. Also, would it be possible to meet with Eddy Taylor in the near future on this matter Signed Nicole Kennedy” May 31, 1999 INTERNAL CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS MEMO To: Nicole Kennedy From: Michel Pare Subject: schnell Vs. Machiavelli – Reply- Reply Nicole, this is a telephone hate-messages case (Internet)) that has a strange history. The original intake file was allegedly lost for several months. When it miraculously resurfaced, it was sent off to Eddie Taylor for an opinion whether the messages met the legal test for s.13. Eddie said yes, and the complaint form was refreshed and sent off to the complainant. At the same time, Gerry was sending me Emails asking whether we should be taking the complaint at all. In the end the complaint form was signed, but Gerry is still raising the case with me. He wants us to try to deal with it quickly, perhaps by getting the Internet provider to do something. I understand that the case has been assigned to Martin Chaumont, and that Legal has been asked for another opinion. You might want to keep an eye on this case, as Gerry will be interested to know what is going on. May 31, 1999 INTERNAL CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS MEMO To: Michel Pare From: Nicole Kennedy Subject: schnell Vs. Machiavelli – Reply- Reply Hi, I have already had a conversation with Gerry on whether this complaint should have been taken or not. He agreed that since it has been taken to proceed to investigate. The discussion with Francois was not so much a legal opinion as it was advice on how to proceed with obtaining evidence as required prior to notification under section 13 given that it is an internet issue rather than telephonic – Bill said that Francois was knowledgeable on such things. If you have suggestions, I would welcome them. May 31, 1999 INTERNAL CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS MEMO To: Nicole Kennedy From: Michel Pare Subject: schnell Vs. Machiavelli – Reply- Reply That's odd, because Gerry raised the case again with me this morning! Oh, well. My only suggestion at this point, once you have identified the Internet service provider, would be to find out what their rules are for web pages (if they have any) and what action they could and would take to shut down the site. June 1,1999 INTERNAL CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS MEMO To: FRANCOIS LUMU From: MARTIN CHAUMONT Subject: schnell Vs. Machiavelli CC: NICOLE KENNEDY I would like to meet with you as soon as possible, to discuss this case. As you are aware mark schnell has filed a section 13 complaint against Machiavelli Associates Emprize Inc on April 29,1999. He is alleging that the web site, contains hate messages against homosexuals.” These are the issues I would like to discuss in regard of the investigation: - Prior to notification, we need to determine how to gather the needed proof when visiting the web site, the frequency of the visits and what to do if the site has been moved. - The Informatics division informed us that they cannot provide a non individualized e-mail account that would shield the fact that the visitor is from the CHRC. In light of this, we have to find an alternative way to visit the site. I was thinking about visiting it from either an Internet café or a public library. Thank you and have a nice day, Martin Chaumont 943-9112” July 26, 1999 INTERNAL CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS MEMO TO FILE by Andrea Chase C (that stands for Complainant as in mark schnell) called for status and to advise of his new address and telephone number, 603 – 1865 Barclay Street Vancouver, B.C. V6G 1K7 phone 604-605-0678 cellular 604-841-4321 I advised C we are ready to and will initiate contact with Machiavelli when back from vacation, sometime in the middle of August. A little liberating limerick Lying liberal lawyers, lauding lofty legalese, living lascivious little lives, literally load latent legal largess largely leaning left, leaving legit laymen legitimately lamenting loudly, let's legitimize lawyerslaying, let lawyerslayers lead life. For whom the bells toll Call waiting, she says, abnormally officious yet still somewhat sultry. As the intercom crackles, she continues, you're soon to be former wife's lawyer wishes an audience and she is really pissed. This time because you returned that special delivery document unopened. I told her you said you'd rather have your eyes pierced than talk to her, but she insisted… Thanks, I'll take her call I said I would sign your 69page document proviso you only faxed me the last page where my signature is required. I said I would fax it right back to you so you could re-staple it on to the first 68 pages. I explained at infinitum that I would not read the first 68 pages but would sign the signature page as long as it wasn't attached to the other 68 because that would imply that I had read the attached 68 pages, which I explicitly said I would not do. So in order to facilitate your proceeding, please fax me the sixty-ninth signature page. I will sign it immediately and fax it back even quicker. Please, please she pleadingly pleads her poorly purported plight. We cannot proceed without your signature. As an officer of the Court I insist you read the entire document before you sign it. It's unethical for me to act otherwise. Unethical? You're a divorce lawyer who's threatened me with - Or Else - without consequence capabilities, bringing new meaning to the word unethical! Lets get real; you've gone to great lengths to ensure that all 69 pages are entirely in my wife's favor. There are no benefits befitting me anywhere in that document. She gets everything less your fees. I claim nothing. I expect nothing. I need not read anything. Please, please, she interjects you should get something from the divorce settlement. Never does one party cede 100% to the other without some benefit. And how would we establish what that benefit might be? Well we start by making a statement of agreed to facts. Hold it, more billable hours for you? Well yes but… I would rather give the money to Zundel so this discussion is over. If in the next 10 minutes you fax me page 69 I will sign it have it witnessed and or notarized, whatever your pleasure and I will then fax it back. Bye and have a nice day. The intercom clicks, you're not going to believe this but I have a Revenue Canada lawyer holding for you. I have a meeting with a Human Resources Ministry lawyer regarding my son. His mother got the police to arrest him for stealing a stop sign. I haven't got all the details but I bet that he'll be some piss ant anal retentive lawyer wanting to make a Federal case to justify his existence so tell the Rev Can lawyer to take a number, I'll be back at four. Lawyers & Dragons, Dragons & Dungeons what's the name of that game? Dragonslayers & …. What about Lawyerslayers? Oh to be a Lawyerslayer! Where is Machiavelli or a Machiavellian Lawyerslayer when you need them?
click |
 for chapter2
|